A logical framework for prioritized goal change

نویسندگان

  • Shakil M. Khan
  • Yves Lespérance
چکیده

Most previous logical accounts of goals do not deal with prioritized goals and goal dynamics properly. Many are restricted to achievement goals. In this paper, we develop a logical account of goal change that addresses these deficiencies. In our account, we do not drop lower priority goals permanently when they become inconsistent with other goals and the agent’s knowledge; rather, we make such goals inactive. We ensure that the agent’s chosen goals/intentions are consistent with each other and the agent’s knowledge. When the world changes, the agent recomputes her chosen goals and some inactive goals may become active again. This ensures that our agent maximizes her utility. We prove that the proposed account has desirable properties. We also discuss previous work on postulates for goal revision.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Prioritized Goals and Subgoals in a Logical Account of Goal Change - A Preliminary Report

Most previous logical accounts of goal change do not deal with prioritized goals and do not handle subgoals and their dynamics properly. Many are restricted to achievement goals. In this paper, we develop a logical account of goal change that addresses these deficiencies. In our account, we do not drop lower priority goals permanently when they become inconsistent with other goals and the agent...

متن کامل

Handling prioritized goals and subgoals in a logical account of goal change

Most existing formal models of goals [2, 3] assume that all goals are equally important and many only deal with achievement goals. Moreover, they do not guarantee that an agent’s goals will properly evolve when an action/event occurs, e.g. when the agent’s beliefs/knowledge changes or a goal is adopted or dropped. Also, most of these frameworks do not model the dependencies between goals and th...

متن کامل

Two representations for iterative non-prioritized change

We address a general representation problem for belief change, and describe two interrelated representations for iterative nonprioritized change: a logical representation in terms of persistent epistemic states, and a constructive representation in terms of flocks of bases.

متن کامل

Disambiguation by Prioritized Circumscription

This paper presents a method of resolving ambiguity by using a variant of circumscription, prioritized circumscription. In a disambiguation task, human seems to use various preferences which have various strength. In prioritized circumscription, we can express these preferences as defeasible constraints with various strength and we infer the most preferable logical models which satisfy stronger...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010